• Talk about your wish list for laboratory quality control
• Explore the connection between laboratory error and clinical cost
• Examine how analytical processes with a high sigma and an acceptable number of Medically Unreliable Results (MURs) failing TEa can have unacceptable clinical cost of error
• See examples of analytical processes with unacceptable number of MURs (low sigm) and acceptable clinical cost of error
• Learn how to verify the effectiveness of QC processes to detect analytical failure - and why so many fail
• Critique reports to identify opportunities to reduce patient risk and clinical cost in NEW risk management reports from our review of 357 QC samples from 9 analytes in 37 laboratories
• Discuss how you would explain this to executives who would see the value of managing laboratory risk to reduce the number and clinical cost of laboratory error

What you will see & do:

Reduce Patient Risk

Reduce Clinical Cost of Laboratory Error

Online Focus Group March 12, 2020

Speaker, Zoe Brooks, has devoted her life to creating a quality control software program to improve patient care by providing better laboratory results by automating risk management.

"As an author, educator and consultant with over 40 years front line, management and research experience, I am completely convinced that the laboratory community globally needs to significantly improve how people manage quality. My solution, Mathematically-OptimiZed Risk Evaluation(c) or ‘M.O.R.E. Quality(c)’ is a better, simpler, more effective process than Six Sigma and Westgard rules - and proves that claim every time you use it. "

Presented by

AWEsome Numbers Inc.

https://awesome-numbers.com/